mtDNA and AFLP markers demonstrate limited genetic differentiation within the<i>Pyganodon cataracta</i>–<i>Pyganodon fragilis</i>freshwater mussel complex in Atlantic Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two nominal species of freshwater mussels, Pyganodon cataracta (Say, 1817) (eastern floater) and Pyganodon fragilis (Lamarck, 1819) (Newfoundland floater), occur in Atlantic Canada, but their taxonomic status has been controversial. We analyzed the female-transmitted mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (i.e., FCOI) and nuclear internal transcribed spacer region (ITS-1) gene sequences, as well as multilocus amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers, to evaluate genetic variation in Pyganodon specimens from Atlantic Canada. We found that Pyganodon samples from this region displayed no or extremely low (i.e., <0.5%) genetic divergence for ITS-1 and FCOI sequence data, respectively. Inferences from nested clade analysis of FCOI haplotypes suggest restricted gene flow with isolation by distance and contiguous range expansion. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from presence or absence of nuclear-encoded AFLP bands showed moderate geographic structuring among provinces but no correspondence between mtDNA haplotypes and AFLP profiles. Similarly, there was no correspondence between presence of a single or a double loop on the umbo and FCOI haplotype. These mtDNA and AFLP markers demonstrate limited genetic differentiation within the Pyganodon cataracta–Pyganodon fragilis freshwater mussel complex in Atlantic Canada and question the species-level distinctness of these putative taxa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".