Tempol improves vascular function in the mesenteric vascular bed of senescent rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ageing is associated with structural and functional alterations of the vasculature. The nature of age-related vascular disorders is not completely understood. Oxidative stress is hypothesized to play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of vascular complications. We investigated the effects of chronic treatment with the superoxide dismutase mimetic tempol (4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidinoxyl) on vascular function in the mesenteric vasculature of aged rats. Young (3 weeks) and old (40 weeks) Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with tempol (1 mM in drinking water) or vehicle for 3 weeks. Arterial blood pressure was slightly, but significantly, higher in old than in young rats. Tempol had no effect on arterial blood pressure. The vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5-HT) were exaggerated in the mesenteric vascular bed (MVB) removed from old rats. Vasodilator responses to acetylcholine (ACh), papaverine (PPV), and isoprenaline (ISO) were reduced in the MVB of old rats in comparison with young rats. Chronic treatment of old rats with tempol normalized their responses to NE and 5-HT. The dilator responses to ACh, PPV, and ISO were similar between old rats receiving tempol and young rats. The present findings suggest that oxidative stress contributes to vascular dysfunction in the mesentery of old rats. The vasculoprotective effects of tempol remain to be elucidated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".