Vaccination coverage in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis followed at a paediatric tertiary care centre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the vaccination coverage rate of patients with JIA followed at a paediatric tertiary care centre and to determine the coverage rate for individual vaccines required as per the Quebec Immunization Protocol. METHODS: Consecutive JIA patients coming for their scheduled visit were included if they were between 2 and 18 years of age and if they had an available written immunization record. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the proportion of children with complete vaccination status according to the Quebec Immunization Protocol at 2.5, 10.5 years and at their last clinic visit. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included. Complete vaccination according to schedule was identified in only 52% of patients at 2.5 years, 68% at 10.5 years and 61% at their last clinic visit. The vaccination coverage rate for individual vaccines was good overall with the exception of low measles, mumps and rubella vaccine coverage at 2.5 years (58%). CONCLUSION: Despite overall good vaccination coverage rate for individual vaccines, only 61% of our cohort had a complete vaccination status at their last clinic visit. Measures to optimize vaccination coverage, such as catch-up vaccination, should be implemented when possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".