The Effect of Surge Testing on the Voltage Endurance Life of Stator Coils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surge tests with short rise times are used to ensure turn insulation integrity in form-wound vacuum-pressure impregnated (VPI) coils prior to resin treatment. Use of this test migrated from the evaluation of fully processed generator bars and random wound stators. The dielectric properties of the insulation in these systems are fully developed at the time of testing. This is not true of "green" (unimpregnated) VPI coils. Although surge testing is a valuable manufacturing quality test, an excessive transient electric field in uncured coils may cause irreversible changes to the insulation. These changes may affect the life of the insulation system after complete impregnation and cure. This paper describes laboratory tests and finite element simulations that examine the effect of applied surge test voltage and number of applied pulses on voltage endurance (VE) life. The sympathetic voltage response in a single coil as a function of its location within a winding is described for a stator undergoing green surge testing as part of a quality assurance program. Results of VE testing and sample dissection data are presented. Test voltage was identified a more significant factor on VE life than the number of pulses applied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".