MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144081937 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.174412

Evolution of spin excitations in a gapped antiferromagnet from the quantum to the high-temperature limit

2002· article· en· W2144081937 on OpenAlexaff
M. Kenzelmann, R. A. Cowley, W. J. L. Buyers, R. Coldea, M. Enderle, D. F. McMorrow

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntiferromagnetismCondensed matter physicsLimit (mathematics)PhysicsSpin (aerodynamics)QuantumQuantum limitZero temperatureQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have mapped from the quantum to the classical limit the spin excitation spectrum of the antiferromagnetic spin-1 Heisenberg chain system ${\mathrm{CsNiCl}}_{3}$ in its paramagnetic phase from $T=5$ to $200\mathrm{K}.$ Neutron scattering shows that the excitations are resonant and dispersive up to at least $T=70\mathrm{K}\ensuremath{\simeq}2.7J,$ but broaden considerably with increasing temperature. The dispersion flattens out with increasing temperature as the resonance energy $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ at the antiferromagnetic wave vector increases and the maximum in the dispersion decreases. The correlation length $\ensuremath{\xi}$ between $T=12$ and $50\mathrm{K}$ is in agreement with quantum Monte Carlo calculations for the spin-1 chain. $\ensuremath{\xi}$ is also consistent with the single mode approximation, suggesting that the excitations are short-lived single particle excitations. Below $T=12\mathrm{K}$ where three-dimensional spin correlations are important, $\ensuremath{\xi}$ is shorter than predicted and the experiment is not consistent with the random phase approximation for coupled quantum chains. At $T=200\mathrm{K},$ the structure factor and second energy moment of the excitation spectrum are in excellent agreement with the high-temperature series expansion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207