Serum Calcium as Prognosticator in Ischemic Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Calcium (Ca(2+)) plays a role in the cellular and molecular pathways of ischemic neuronal death. We evaluated the impact of both early and delayed Ca(2+) levels on clinical outcomes from acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: The relations between blood calcium level obtained early (<4.5 hours), and delayed (72 to 96 hours) after ischemic stroke onset versus clinical outcomes were analyzed in 826 subjects enrolled in an international trial in the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive. Subjects were categorized into Ca(2+) quartiles. Outcome measures analyzed included baseline and 72- to 96-hour stroke severity, as well as 3-month functional and global disability scales. The independent effect of calcium on outcome was evaluated by median and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty-nine (80%) of the trial subjects had complete baseline data including Ca(2+) levels. Bivariately, the highest delayed Ca(2+) quartile (versus lowest) was associated with lesser stroke severity and better 3-month functional and independence scale outcomes (all P<0.001), but no significant outcome differences were noted among early Ca(2+) levels. In multivariable analysis, delayed Ca(2+) in the highest quartile (versus lowest quartile) was associated with greater 3-month independence score on the Barthel Index scale (76.9 versus 55.4, P=0.006). No other significant outcome differences were noted between highest and lowest quartiles for both early and delayed Ca(2+) quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated 72- to 96-hour serum Ca(2+) levels independently predict greater independence 3 months after ischemic stroke, but very early serum Ca(2+) appear not to have any prognostic significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".