MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144151012 · doi:10.1115/pvp2011-57615

Fitness for Service Assessment of the Thermal Sleeve Weld Failure for Steam Generator Reheat Condensate Nozzle in CANDU6 Nuclear Plant

2011· article· en· W2144151012 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. Ghafouri-Azar, Alice Sze, Dan Vlaicu, Mike Stojakovic

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Canadian institutionsOntario Power Generation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleWeldingNuclear engineeringStructural engineeringMaterials scienceBoiler (water heating)EngineeringMechanical engineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An assessment was completed to address the failure of internal thermal sleeve weld for reheat condensate nozzle of steam generators. The plant is operated by Ontario Power Generation (OPG) in Pickering, and has CANDU®6 type reactors. The objective of assessment was to evaluate the effect of the failed weld on the overall structural integrity of the nozzle for the defined operating service conditions. The fitness for service of the steam generator nozzle was demonstrated by comparing the maximum stress ranges of the initial nozzle design with the failed weld nozzle configuration under the same service conditions. Two nozzle configurations were considered for this assessment. One configuration represents the original shape with no leakage at weld indicating as-designed condition. Transient heat transfer and the stress analyses were performed according to the defined service limits. Another configuration completed for the faulty condition in which weld is failed and thermal sleeve separated. The same transients as the first configuration were applied, but the leakage was introduced at the thermal sleeve weld. The effect of leakage was considered by changing the convection heat transfer coefficient in annulus area between the external side of sleeve and internal surface of the nozzle. Critical locations on the nozzle were identified for the whole transient cycles, and assigned different stress lines. The maximum and minimum stress intensity ranges of the initial nozzle design and the cracked weld nozzle design were compared for these stress lines. It was concluded that the thermal sleeve weld failure with the conservatively postulated leakage flow provides better results in terms of stress ranges compared to the as-design condition. The thermal shield was over constrained in as-design condition. And for the fitness for service evaluation in was decided to leave the failed weld in-service without repairing it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Engineering Thermal-HydraulicsFrench-language works237,207