Revisiting Tungsten Trioxide Hydrates (TTHs) Synthesis - Is There Anything New?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a very simple precipitation route to prepare a layered perovskite-type structure, tungsten trioxide hydrate (TTH), with the nominal chemical formula of WO(3) x 1.3 H(2)O (identical with 1/2H(2)W(2)O(7) x 1.6 H(2)O), using aqueous Na(2)WO(4) and SrCl(2). Our investigation shows that the concentration of HCl used to dissolve the SrCl(2) plays a crucial role in the stabilization of different structure types of layered TTHs. Highly acidic SrCl(2) (dissolved in 9 M HCl) solution yields an orthorhombic layered TTH of WO(3) x 2 H(2)O, while SrCl(2) dissolved in 3 M HCl appears to give an A-site-deficient Ruddlesdon-Popper (RP) related double-perovskite-type layered structure (DOLS-TTH). A well-known scheelite-type structure is obtained under weakly basic conditions (pH = 10.3 for Na(2)WO(4(aq)), 7.0 for SrCl(2(aq))). Previously, RP-type a DOLS of H(2)W(2)O(7) x 0.58 H(2)O was prepared, using an acid-leaching method, from the corresponding n = 2 member of the layered Aurivillius phase (AP) Bi(2)W(2)O(9). Powder X-ray diffraction showed the formation of layered RP DOLS with a large d spacing approximately 12.5 A, which is consistent with acid-leaching (Kuto et al. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 4479-4484; Wang et al. J. Solid State Chem. 2007, 180, 1125-1129) and exfoliation (Schaak et al. Chem. Commun. 2002, 706-707) methods for synthesized TTHs. The proposed DOLS-TTH structure of newly prepared TTHs was further confirmed by an intercalation reaction using n-octylamine (C8A). A transmission electron microscopy study showed the formation of nanosized particles, and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray analysis showed the absence of Na and Sr in the air-dried, as-precipitated products under acidic conditions. The bulk electrical (proton) conductivity of presently prepared TTHs was found to be on the order of 10(-4)-10(-3) S/cm at room temperature in wet N(2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".