MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144197011 · doi:10.1002/mrm.1227

Gd‐DTPA bolus tracking in the myocardium using <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> fast acquisition relaxation mapping (<i>T</i><sub>1</sub> FARM)

2001· article· en· W2144197011 on OpenAlexafffund
Deanna D. Bellamy, Raoul S. Pereira, Charles A. McKenzie, Frank S. Prato, Dick Drost, Jane Sykes, Gerald Wisenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CentreWestern UniversityFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of CalgaryLawson Health Research Institute
FundersMedical Research CouncilSiemens CanadaMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsBolus (digestion)PerfusionNuclear medicineEx vivoIn vivoFirst passMedicineChemistryCardiologyInternal medicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MRI methods currently used for bolus tracking in the myocardium, such as saturation recovery turbo-fast low-angle shot (FLASH) (srTFL), are limited by signal intensity (SI) saturation at high contrast agent (CA) concentrations. By using T1 fast acquisition relaxation mapping (T1 FARM), a Gd-DTPA bolus (0.075 vs. 0.025 mmol/kg) may be injected without causing saturation. This study tested the feasibility of in vivo T1 FARM bolus tracking under rest/stress conditions in seven beagles with multiple permanently occluded branches of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Although it underestimated the myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) measured ex vivo using radioactive microspheres (mean +/- SEM; 3.60 +/- 0.26), the MPR determined upon application of the modified Kety model (1.86 +/- 0.10) enabled distinction between normal and infarcted tissue. The partition coefficient (lambda) estimated at rest and stress using the modified Kety model underestimated ex vivo radioactive measurements in infarcted tissue (0.25 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.26 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.79 +/- 0.08 ml/g, P < 0.0001) yet was accurate in normal tissue (0.28 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.33 +/- 0.01 ml/g, P = NS). Thus, although unsuitable for myocardial viability assessment, T1 FARM bolus tracking shows potential for assessment of myocardial perfusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207