In vivo replication kinetics and transcription patterns of the nucleopolyhedrovirus (NeabNPV) of the balsam fir sawfly, Neodiprion abietis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DNA replication and transcription of NeabNPV, the nucleopolyhedrovirus (NPV) of the balsam fir sawfly, Neodiprion abietis (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae), in host larvae were investigated. NPV DNA replication kinetics and gene-expression patterns have been resolved only in lepidopteran cell-culture systems and in limited in vivo experiments with lepidopteran larvae. Furthermore, there are significant differences in pathologies caused by lepidopteran NPVs, which replicate in many tissues, and hymenopteran NPVs, known to replicate in midgut epithelium only. Despite the differences in host specificity and pathology, NeabNPV DNA replication kinetics were similar to those reported for lepidopteran NPVs. Maximal NeabNPV DNA synthesis was observed between 4 and 24 h post-inoculation (p.i.) but, in contrast to lepidopteran NPVs, synthesis continued at a lower rate up to 72 h p.i. Selected NeabNPV genes exhibited a cascade pattern of transcription similar to that of lepidopteran NPVs. RT-PCR products of the NeabNPV lef-1, lef-2 and dnapol transcripts were observed as early as 2 h p.i., whilst lef-8 and lef-9, encoding putative viral RNA polymerase subunits, were detected at 1 and 6 h p.i., respectively. Two structural late transcripts (gp41 and p74) were observed from 6 h p.i. The very late factor 1 (vlf-1) transcript, a transactivator of very late genes, was observed from 12 h p.i., but the very late transcript polh, encoding the major occlusion protein, polyhedrin, was observed from 24 h p.i. This study provides the first insight into DNA replication and gene expression of a non-lepidopteran baculovirus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".