Rats Injected with Syngenic Rat Apoptotic Neutrophils Develop Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are present in sera from patients with various forms of vasculitis-associated glomerulonephritis. Because autoantibodies may be directed against antigens presented by apoptotic cells, generation of ANCA using apoptotic neutrophils (PMN) in syngenic Brown Norway (BN) rats was attempted. These rats are T-helper type 2-prone animals, already used successfully in other ANCA-positive animal models. BN rats received repeated injections of buffer or of nonapoptotic or apoptotic PMN aged in cultures, in the footpad and once intravenously. Four of five rats that received injections of PMN aged for 48 h developed ANCA, which cross-reacted with human leukocyte elastase in three cases. None of the rats that received injections of freshly isolated neutrophils developed ANCA. One rat that received buffer injection and that exhibited chronic skin infection developed delayed ANCA. None of the rats showed signs of disease: no weight loss and no proteinuria. Then a subnephritogenic dose of antibody directed against rat glomerular basement membrane was injected. Rats then were killed, and different organs were frozen and studied. No significant lesions were found in kidneys or lungs. It is concluded that injections of apoptotic but not freshly isolated PMN can generate ANCA in BN rats. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the immunization mechanism and the ability of these autoantibodies to initiate vasculitis in these experimental animals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".