Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper describes an algorithm to count and classify cells of different geometrical shapes on a given image. The algorithm assumes that it is known a priori the type of geometries to be recognized and it allows for many different geometrical shapes to appear in the same image with different sizes, locations and orientations. The algorithm combines classical tools, mainly the two dimensional Fourier transform, with newly developed tools for edge enhancements as well as the main technical contribution of the present paper, which consists in the definition of an over-complete set of spanning functions. These functions are constructed from geometrical templates of size comparable to the image cells; moreover, the resulting functions are scaled and rotated to assure the recognition of all image cells. We then describe an algorithm that decomposes the image in its most likely elements. The combination of ingredients used by the algorithm provides a cell recognition tool that is very robust, provides high resolution to discern among competing candidate cells and delivers practical computational efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it