MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144273455 · doi:10.1080/08820130802191375

The Role of Macrophages in Utero-placental Interactions During Normal and Pathological Pregnancy

2008· review· en· W2144273455 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen J. Renaud, Charles H. Graham

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunological Investigations · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeciduaTrophoblastPlacentaBiologyFetusImmunologyImmune systemPregnancyImmune tolerancePhenotypePlacentationAntigenFetal membraneCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intimate association between maternal and placental tissues elicits an interesting immunological paradox. Placental tissue contains paternal antigens, but under normal circumstances the semi-allogeneic fetus and placenta are not attacked by the maternal immune system. Interestingly, this tolerance to fetal antigens occurs in the presence of a large number of maternal leukocytes, almost all of which are members of the innate immune system. Macrophages are one of the most abundant leukocytes in the decidua and their numbers remain constant throughout gestation. They are recruited to the decidua by both stromal cells and trophoblast cells, where they adopt a specialized phenotype that may assist in various aspects of decidual homeostasis, placental development, and tolerance to the semi-allogeneic trophoblast. Aberrant behavior of these macrophages can affect trophoblast function and placental development, potentially leading to a spectrum of adverse pregnancy outcomes ranging from pre-eclampsia to fetal growth restriction or demise. This review will focus on the phenotype and putative functions of decidual macrophages in normal pregnancy, and how abnormal activation of these cells can affect various aspects of placental development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations153
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunological InvestigationsSame topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207