MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144421128 · doi:10.1109/isspa.2010.5605556

Text-independent distributed speaker identification and verification using GMM-UBM speaker models for mobile communications

2010· article· en· W2144421128 on OpenAlexaff
Md Fozur Rahman Chowdhury, Sid‐Ahmed Selouani, Douglas O’Shaughnessy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du QuébecInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de MonctonUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpeech recognitionSpeaker recognitionSpeaker diarisationMixture modelMaximum a posteriori estimationHidden Markov modelSpeaker identificationIdentification (biology)Artificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)Pattern recognition (psychology)Maximum likelihood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the simulation results of a speaker identification and verification (SIDV) system that would be efficient for resource limited mobile devices. The proposed system works as a text-independent system within the distributed speech recognition (DSR) framework and is designed to identify a target speaker or imposter using short digit utterances rather than long utterances. In this distributed SIDV (DSIDV), the target speaker model is developed by using the most popular generative system called a GMM-UBM system. A Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) for each true speaker is derived from the Universal Background Model (UBM) by using Bayesian maximum a posteriori (MAP) adaptation. The objective of this paper is to show how speaker recognition and verification over telephone channels can be done using short speeches and DSR technology robust to channel distortions. The ETSI Aurora2 speech corpus was tested in these experiments. The experimental results show that the proposed DSIDV system yields excellent identification and detection performances in a ETSI DSR evaluation task and would be suitable for small hand held mobile devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207