Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acknowledgements. Introduction-Human Rights and Anthropology: Mark Goodale (George Mason University). Part I: Conceptual and Historical Foundations:. 1. Statement on Human Rights (1947) and commentaries: American Anthropological Association, Julian Steward (Late of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), H. G. Barnett (Late of University of Oregon). 2. The Decline of the Nation-State and the End of the Rights of Man: Hannah Arendt. 3. The Good, The Bad, and the Intolerable: Minority Group Rights: Will Kymlicka (Queen's University, Canada). 4. Toward a Cross-Cultural Approach to Defining International Standards of Human Rights: Abdullahi Ahmed An -Na'im (Emory University). 5. Human Rights and Capabilities: Amartya Sen (Harvard University). Part II: Anthropology and Human Rights Activism: . 6. Declaration on Anthropology and Human Rights (1999): American Anthropological Association. 7. Anthropology, Human Rights, and Social Transformation: Ellen Messer (Brandeis University). 8. Excavations of the Heart: Healing Fragmented Communities: Victoria Sanford (City University of New York, Lehman College). 9. Rethinking Health and Human Rights: Time for a Paradigm Shift: Paul Farmer and Nicole Gastineau (both Harvard University). 10. Rotten Trade: Millennial Capitalism, Human Values, and Global Justice in Organs Trafficking: Nancy Scheper-Hughes (University of California, Berkeley). 11. Do Anthropologists Have an Ethical Obligation to Promote Human Rights?: Terence Turner (Cornell University), Laura Graham (University of Iowa), Carolyn Fluehr-Lobban (Rhode Island College), Jane Cowan (University of Sussex, UK). Part III: The Ethnography of Human Rights Practices: . 12. Representing Human Rights Violations: Social Contexts and Subjectivities: Richard. A. Wilson (University of Connecticut). 13. Gendered Intersections: Collective and Individual Rights in Indigenous Women's Experience: Shannon Speed (University of Texas, Austin). 14. Human Rights and Moral Panics: Listening to Popular Grievances: Harri Englund (University of Cambridge, UK). 15. Legal Transplants and Cultural Translation: Making Human Rights in the Vernacular: Sally Engle Merry (New York University). Part IV: Critical Anthropologies of Human Rights: . 16. Culture and Rights after Culture and Rights: Jane Cowan (University of Sussex, UK). 17. Human Rights as Cultural Practice: An Anthropological Critique: Ann-Belinda Preis (UNESCO, France). 18. Between Universalism and Relativism: A Critique of the UNESCO Concept of Culture: Thomas Hylland Eriksen (University of Oslo, Norway). 19. Toward a Critical Anthropology of Human Rights: Mark Goodale (George Mason University). Appendix: Websites on Human Rights
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".