An efficient design method for vector broadcast systems with common information
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the problem of determining an optimal transmission scheme for broadcasting a common message over vector channels, given (perfect) channel knowledge at both the receive and transmit ends. We provide an efficient method for jointly designing a linear transmitter and and a set of linear receivers so as to minimize a weighted mean square error (WMSE) of the data estimates. The computational efficiency follows from the convex formulations that we develop. These formulations enable utilization of highly efficient interior point methods. For diagonal channel matrices, which appear in multicarrier systems that employ cyclic prefixing, we show that the optimal transmitter is obtained by subcarrier allocation and power loading. The set of minimum MSE transceivers for a vector broadcast system is parametrized by a unitary matrix degree of freedom. For the case of diagonal systems, we show how this unitary matrix can be chosen so that the symbol error rate is minimized (over the given set). This optimal unitary matrix ensures that, for each receiver, the subcarrier signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) are all the same. Simulations indicate that our designs can provide significantly improved performance over standard designs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".