Development of a new in‐vial standard gas system for calibrating solid‐phase microextraction in high‐throughput and on‐site applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, an innovative, reproducible, and reusable standard generator vial is presented. The standard generator vial consists of vacuum-pump oil doped with McReynolds probes (benzene, 2-pentanone, pyridine, nitropropane, 1-pentanol, and n-octane) mixed with a polystyrene-divinylbenzene resin without functional groups. The evaluation of this vial was fully automated on a multifiber exchanger system and the extraction/desorption cycle, together with the programmed GC-qMS analysis, did not exceed 13 min. The results showed that after 160 extraction/injections cycles of the vial the relative SDs were smaller than 4% for all the standards. A randomized block design was used to evaluate the inter and intravial repeatability, and at 95% level of confidence nonstatistical differences among vials were found. Because of its compacted granular appearance this vial is easy to transport, and it is an ideal calibration standard for bench and field instruments and devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it