MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144475949 · doi:10.1136/vr.156.12.376

Serological evidence of <i>Leptospira interrogans</i> serovar Bratislava infection and its association with abortions in cattle in northern Spain

2005· article· en· W2144475949 on OpenAlexaff
Raquel Atxaerandio, Gorka Adúriz, I. Ziluaga, J. I. Esteban, Louise Maranda, R. C. M. Jaime

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Record · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicLeptospirosis research and findings
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeroprevalenceLeptospiraSerotypeVeterinary medicineLeptospirosisSerologyPopulationBiologyLeptospira interrogansMedicineVirologyAntibodyEnvironmental healthImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Basque Country of Spain to determine the seroprevalence of 10 Leptospira serovars in a population of dairy cattle with poor fertility, and a case-control study was carried out in another northern area to investigate the role of Leptospira interrogans serovar Bratislava in abortions. L. Bratislava was the most prevalent serovar in the cross-sectional study, with 25.4 per cent of the cows testing positive in the microagglutination test when a cut-off of 1:10 or higher was applied, followed by Leptospira Hardjo (8.2 per cent), Leptospira Pomona (7.7 per cent), Leptospira Autumnalis (0.7 per cent) and Leptospira Copenhageni (0.1 per cent). In the case-control study the seroprevalence of L. Bratislava was significantly higher among the cows which had aborted when a titre of 1:300 or more was used as a cut-off (9.7 per cent v 3.4 per cent, P=0.008); 69 per cent of the L. Bratislava-infected cows that had aborted apparently aborted as a result of the infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary RecordSame topicLeptospirosis research and findingsFrench-language works237,207