MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144526341 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602072

Large-scale capacitated part-routing in the presence of process and routing flexibilities and setup costs

2005· article· en· W2144526341 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Operational Research Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRouting (electronic design automation)OutsourcingScheduling (production processes)Production (economics)Mathematical optimizationProcess (computing)Scale (ratio)PurchasingProduct (mathematics)Operations researchHeuristicsFixed costOperations managementMathematicsEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a Lagrangean relaxation-based heuristic procedure to generate a near-optimal solution to large-scale capacitated part-routing problems through a cellular manufacturing system with both routing flexibilities and setup times. Several alternate process plans exist for each product. Any given operation can be performed on alternate machines at different costs. The part demands can be satisfied from internal production or through outsourcing. The objective is to minimize the total material handling, production, outsourcing, and setup costs, subject to satisfying all the part demands and not exceeding any of the machine capacity limits. Our computational experiments show that large problems involving several thousand products and decision variables can be solved in a reasonable amount of computer time to within 1% of their optimal solutions. The proposed procedure is general enough to be applied directly or with slight modifications to real-life, industrial-sized problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it