MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144529230 · doi:10.14800/rci.326

The Androgen Receptor Is a Key Component of Myometrium Phenotype Programming During Pregnancy

2014· article· en· W2144529230 on OpenAlexaff
Xuesen Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueReceptors & Clinical Investigation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDaegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology
KeywordsG protein-coupled receptorReceptorCell biologyBiologyNeurotransmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptorNeuroscienceChemistrySignal transductionBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

N-type voltage-gated Ca 2+ (CaV2.2) channels, which enable synaptic transmission by triggering neurotransmitter release, are tightly modulated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) via several downstream signaling messengers, such as G, calmodulin, arachidonic acid and PIP2.However, the molecular mechanism by which Gq/11-coupled receptors (GqPCRs) suppress CaV2.2 currents remains unclear.In this research highlight, we review our recent finding that M1 muscarinic receptors inhibit CaV2.2 channels through both G-mediated voltage-dependent (VD) and Gαq/11/PLC-mediated voltage-independent (VI) pathways.Our photometry results also demonstrate that G-mediated VD inhibition of CaV2.2 channels initiates approximately 3 s earlier than VI inhibition, and is strongly potentiated in cells expressing plasma membrane-localized CaV subunits.Our observations demonstrate a novel mechanism for CaV2.2 channel modulation by GqPCRs where the subcellular location of CaV subunits plays a critical role in determining the voltage-dependence of current suppression by M1 receptors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReceptors & Clinical InvestigationSame topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207