MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144538531 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2007.916126

An Efficient High-Order Extrapolation Procedure for Multiaspect Electromagnetic Scattering Analysis

2008· article· en· W2144538531 on OpenAlexafffund
Adrian Ngoly, S. McFee

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMedical Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExtrapolationMethod of moments (probability theory)Radar cross-sectionComputational electromagneticsScatteringComputer scienceElectromagnetic fieldPhysical opticsWaveformPhysicsField (mathematics)Computational physicsRadarApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisOpticsMathematicsTelecommunicationsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new high-order extrapolation procedure for computing multiaspect electromagnetic scattering characteristics for arbitrarily shaped 3-D conducting targets. The method aims to reduce the number of simulation angles required to resolve a monostatic radar cross section when the method of moments is used for perfect electrically conducting targets. The methodology developed in this contribution employs a novel procedure for automatically computing the higher order moments required for the implementation of the asymptotic waveform evaluation extrapolation technique. The method uses the Leibnitz theorem and the Faa di Bruno formula for computing higher derivatives of the incident electric field, with respect to the angles of incidence. Three numerical case studies are provided to demonstrate the validity and efficacy of the new method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207