MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144588584 · doi:10.1603/an10092

Frequencies of Diploid Males in Natural Populations of Three North American Bumble Bee (<i>Bombus</i>) Species (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

2011· article· en· W2144588584 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Troy L. Whidden, Robin E. Owen

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Entomological Society of America · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyApidaePloidyHymenopteraZoologyApoideaEcologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We used four DNA microsatellite markers and detected diploid males in two out of three species of North American bumble bees from Alberta, Canada. The estimated average proportion of diploid males, , in Bombus occidentalis Greene and Bombus perplexus Cresson was ≈ 3% (n = 112) and 6% (n = 104), respectively. However, there was no significant difference between these estimates. Because no diploid males were detected in the sample (n = 81) of Bombus terricola Kirby, no estimate of could be made directly, but the upper limit to that would be found in a sample of this size, was ≈ 4%. The average over the three species was ≈ 4%. This is the first report of diploid males in natural populations of North American bumble bees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.128 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Entomological Society of AmericaSame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207