MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144660075 · doi:10.3109/09286586.2014.895843

Is it time to move beyond the QALY in vision research?

2014· editorial· en· W2144660075 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven Kymes

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Epidemiology · 2014
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWillingness to payIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioQuality-adjusted life yearCost effectivenessEconomic evaluationIntervention (counseling)Unit (ring theory)Metric (unit)Cost–benefit analysisDiabetic retinopathyActuarial scienceOptometryFamily medicineOperations managementNursingDiabetes mellitusRisk analysis (engineering)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Economic evaluation of health programs is the science of weighing the benefit of a health intervention against its cost. The metric used to evaluate this relationship is the incremental cost-effect...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.310
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.562
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3100.562
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.005
Bibliometrics0.0060.011
Science and technology studies0.0030.015
Scholarly communication0.0160.048
Open science0.0100.011
Research integrity0.0150.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.508
GPT teacher head0.564
Teacher spread0.056 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmic EpidemiologySame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207