Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation with diathermy: an in vitro study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The utilization of diathermy (electrocautery) as an energy source in the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation has generated positive early clinical results. Although this technology is available and affordable, it has not been well studied for this indication. The objectives of this study were: (1) to characterize atrial lesions created by diathermy, (2) to determine relationships between power setting, tissue contact time, and lesion depth and (3) to histologically compare diathermy and unipolar radiofrequency lesions. METHODS: Fresh bovine atrial tissue samples were used to create endocardial lesions using a unipolar diathermy system with a blade tip. A total of 120 lesions were created at varying power settings and tissue contact times. Subendocardial temperatures were recorded. All lesions were examined grossly, then fixed, sectioned and evaluated histologically by a blinded pathologist. Comparisons were made with saline irrigated unipolar radiofrequency lesions. RESULTS: Gross examination revealed extensive tissue destruction of the endocardial surface at the point of contact. Histological examination showed minimal penetrance of the lesions beyond the destroyed tissue margin of the endocardium. This was corroborated by the finding of minimal thermal penetration beyond the endocardium and superficial myocardium. There was a linear relationship between the power setting (15-55 watts), depth of penetrance (2-15 mm) at varying contact times (1-5s/cm). CONCLUSIONS: In this in vitro model, lesions created by diathermy were not transmural, even with high power settings and prolonged contact times. At these settings, significant tissue destruction was observed that may predispose to atrial perforation without achieving penetration. Diathermy did not constitute an effective energy source in the creation of transmural lesions for atrial fibrillation ablation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".