An iterative algorithm for context selection in adaptive entropy coders
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context-based adaptive entropy coding is an essential feature of modern image compression algorithms; however, the design of these coders is non-trivial due to the balance that must be struck between the benefits associated with using a large number of conditioning classes, or contexts, and the penalties resulting from data dilution. The problem is especially severe when coding small sub-images where the amount of data available is small. In this paper, we propose an iterative algorithm that begins with a large number of conditioning classes and then uses a clustering procedure to reduce this number to a desired value. This method is in contrast to the more usual approach of defining contexts in an ad-hoc manner. Experiments are conducted on synthetic data sources having varying amounts of memory, as well as on the sub-images resulting from a wavelet decomposition of an image. The results show that our approach to context selection is effective and that the algorithm automatically learns the structure of the data. This technique could be applied to improve the performance of both image and video coders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it