Detection of <i>Salmonella</i> sp. in <i>Dermanyssus gallinae</i> using an FTA <sup>®</sup> filter‐based polymerase chain reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Salmonella spp. bacteria are responsible for some of the most important zoonoses worldwide. Because Dermanyssus gallinae (DeGeer) (Acari: Dermanyssidae) has been recently reported to be an experimental vector of Salmonella Enteritidis, it would be of benefit to evaluate the presence of this bacterium in mites. A molecular detection tool associating a simple filter-based DNA preparation with a specific 16S rDNA Salmonella sp. polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was described. The limit of detection with this method was 2 x 10(4) bacteria per mite. To adapt this technique for large-scale studies, two sizes of mite pools were tested and a preliminary investigation was carried out on mites from 16 currently or previously contaminated farms. Mites sampled from one farm of each type were positive for Salmonella, suggesting that Dermanyssus could act as a reservoir between flocks. In further investigations, it will be necessary to carry out a large-scale study to assess the role of D. gallinae in the epidemiology of avian salmonellosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".