Characterization of the Outer Membrane Proteome of <i>Leptospira interrogans</i> Expressed during Acute Lethal Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pathogenic Leptospira species adapt to a wide range of environmental conditions during disease transmission and infection. While the proteome of in vitro cultivated Leptospira has been characterized in several studies to date, relatively little is known of the proteome as expressed by Leptospira during disease processes. Isolates of Leptospira obtained from patients suffering the severe pulmonary form of leptospirosis cause acute lethal infection in guinea pigs and chronic asymptomatic infection in rats. Recent studies have demonstrated that protein and lipopolysaccharide constituents of Leptospira recovered from acutely infected guinea pig tissue differ from that of Leptospira in chronically infected rat tissue and in vitro cultivated Leptospira (J. E. Nally, E. Chow, M. C. Fishbein, D. R. Blanco, and M. A. Lovett, Infect. Immun. 73:3251-3260, 2005). In the current study, the proteome of Leptospira expressed during disease processes was characterized relative to that of in vitro cultivated Leptospira (IVCL) after enrichment for hydrophobic membrane proteins with Triton X-114. Protein samples were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and antigens expressed during infection were identified by immunoblotting with monospecific antiserum and convalescent rat serum in addition to mass spectrometry. Results suggest a significant increase in the expression of the outer membrane protein Loa22 during acute infection of guinea pigs relative to other outer membrane proteins, whose expression is generally diminished relative to expression in IVCL. Significant amounts of LipL32 are also expressed by Leptospira during acute infection of guinea pigs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".