Alteration of the position sense at the ankle induced by muscular fatigue in humans
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate how an isometric exhaustion test affects the position sense at the ankle using an active matching task. METHODS: Eight male subjects with a mean age 24.6 yr participated in the study. Subjects' ability to match the right ankle with the position of the left reference ankle position-determined using signed and absolute errors and variability-was investigated. This task was realized for four ankle angular values (in degrees), two in dorsiflexion (P(-20), P(-10)) and two in plantarflexion (P(20), P(10)) and for two experimental conditions: 1) normal and 2) fatigue. Muscular fatigue was induced in tibialis anterior (TA) of the right leg (ankle dorsiflexor) by using an isometric test. Subjects were instructed to maintain a workload of 70% of their maximal voluntary contraction in series of 40 s. RESULTS: With fatigue, subjects produced ankle movements characterized by greater absolute errors for movements of large amplitude in dorsiflexion and for movements of small amplitude in plantarflexion. In addition, using a "worst-case scenario" analysis, results showed that errors were significantly greater than the normal functioning range for 20 degrees dorsiflexion and 10 degrees plantarflexion positioning. CONCLUSIONS: The acuity of the position sense at the ankle is reduced subsequent to a fatigue protocol. The influence and the potential deleterious effects of muscular fatigue on position sense are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it