MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144928224 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01138.2000

Effects of sustained β-adrenergic stimulation on ionic currents of cultured adult guinea pig cardiomyocytes

2002· article· en· W2144928224 on OpenAlexaff
Liming Zhang, Zhiguo Wang, Stanley Nattel

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStimulationInternal medicineEndocrinologyPropranololAntagonistGuinea pigChemistryReceptorBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Short-term stimulation of beta-receptors is known to affect cardiac ion channels; however, the impact of longer-term stimulation on intrinsic channel function is poorly understood. To evaluate this, cultured guinea pig ventricular myocytes were exposed to isoproterenol (10 nM), vehicle, or isoproterenol plus propranolol (1 microM) for 48 h. Sustained exposure to isoproterenol decreased the density of the inward rectifier (I(K1)), slow delayed rectifier (I(Ks)), and L-type Ca2+ (I(Ca L)) currents, effects that were fully prevented by propranolol. Changes in K+ currents were prevented by the beta1-selective antagonist CGP-20712A, unaffected by the beta2-antagonist ICI-118,551, and mimicked by the membrane-permeable cAMP analog 8-bromo-cAMP. Isoproterenol did not alter the current-voltage relationship of the K+ currents but increased the density of T-type Ca2+ current (I(Ca T)) and thereby increased the proportion of the total Ca2+ current at more negative potentials. We conclude that sustained exposure to isoproterenol reduces I(K1), I(Ks), and I(Ca L) density and increases the density of I(Ca T). The direct ionic current remodeling effects of sustained beta-adrenoceptor stimulation resemble changes reported with heart failure and may be important in arrhythmogenic ionic remodeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207