Rapid and Repeatable Elimination of a Parental Genome-Specific DNA Repeat (pGc1R-1a) in Newly Synthesized Wheat Allopolyploids
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent work in the Triticum-Aegilops complex demonstrates that allopolyploidization is associated with an array of changes in low-copy coding and noncoding sequences. Nevertheless, the behavior and fate of repetitive DNA elements that constitute the bulk of nuclear DNA of these plant species is less clear following allopolyploidy. To gain further insight into the genomic events that accompany allopolyploid formation, we investigated fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) patterns of a parental-specific, tandem DNA repeat (pGc1R-1) on three sets of newly synthesized amphiploids with different parental species. It was found that drastic physical elimination of pGc1R-1 copies occurred in all three amphiploids in early generations. DNA gel-blot analysis confirmed the FISH data and estimates indicated that approximately 70-90% of the copies of the pGc1R-1 repeat family were eliminated from the amphiploids by the second to third selfed generations. Thus, allopolyploidy in Triticum-Aegilops can be accompanied by rapid and extensive elimination of parental-specific repetitive DNA sequences, which presumably play a role in the initial stabilization of the nascent amphiploid plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it