ASSESSING THE EFFICACY OF DANSHENFORM COMPOUND IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective : To assess the efficacy of danshenform compound in patient with angina pectoris already on optimal dose of anti anginal therapy assessed by exercise tolerance test. Methodology th week recorded. Total exercise time, onset of chest pain during exercise, onset of ST segments depression before and after treatment with Danshenform compound was recorded. : Thirty eight patients with stable angina were included in the study. Patients were exercised on treadmill according to Bruce protocol at baseline and one week later. At second week, Danshenform compound 500 mg was prescribed bid for four weeks. At the end of 4 weeks, exercise tolerance test was performed. Duration and number of anginal episodes before and at the end of 4th week recorded. Total exercise time, onset of chest pain during exercise, onset of ST segments depression before and after treatment with Danshenform compound was recorded. Results : The number of anginal episodes after 4 weeks treatment with danshenform was reduced significantly from 4.2+2.4 to 1.4+1.6/week (p=0.001). Time of onset of chest pain improved from 4.63+2.4 to 5.4+3.7 minutes (p=0.35) on exercise tolerance test. Duration of exercise increased from 6.52+1.9 minutes to 8.32+2.3 (p=0.001).Time of onset of ST depression increased from 5.8+1.7 to 7.7+1.6 minutes (p=0.001) on stress test. Anginal class improved significantly after 4 weeks of treatment with danshenform compound (p=0.001) with no significant effect on resting heart rate (p=0.58) and systolic blood pressure (p=0.07) respectively. Conclusion : Danshenform compound is useful in reducing anginal episodes, increasing exercise duration, improving functional anginal class, delaying the onset of ST depression on exercise tolerance test in patient with ischemic heart disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".