MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of elastic deformations on the inner core wobble

2009· article· en· W2145117064 on OpenAlexaff
Mathieu Dumberry

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInner coreSpeed wobbleNutationEarth modelMantle (geology)Outer corePhysicsGeodesyAngular momentumEarth's rotationCore (optical fiber)Classical mechanicsCore–mantle boundaryGeophysicsGeologyOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Earth's longest free mode of nutation, the inner core wobble (ICW), consists of a prograde precession of the tilted figure of the inner core with respect to a fixed mantle. The dynamics of the ICW is controlled by coupling at the inner-core boundary (ICB) and by the torque exerted by the rest of the Earth on a tilted inner core. This mode has not yet been observed either directly or indirectly, though theoretical estimates suggest its period should be 2410 solar days or 6.6 yr. However, these estimates were based on models that did not properly take into account elastic deformations associated with a tilted inner core. In this work, we incorporate these elastic deformations in a model of free nutations that rests on an angular momentum formalism. We find that based on an elastic, oceanless and dissipationless earth model corresponding to PREM, elastic deformations within the inner core contribute to a lengthening of the period of the ICW from 2410 to 2715 solar days. The internal forcing caused by the misalignment between surfaces of constant density and centrifugal potential is the most important contribution to elastic deformations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207