Continuous Intraperitoneal Carboplatin Delivery for the Treatment of Late-Stage Ovarian Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rate of failure of chemotherapy treatment in ovarian cancer remains high, resulting in a low 5-year survival rate of 20-40% in patients that present with advanced-stage disease. Treatment-free periods between cycles of chemotherapy may contribute to accelerated tumor cell proliferation and decreased treatment response. The elimination of treatment-free breaks has been deemed beneficial in the context of cell-cycle-specific agents. The potential benefit of this approach for non-cell-cycle-specific agents has not yet been elucidated. The present study is the first to address this issue by investigating the impact of continuous versus intermittent intraperitoneal administration of carboplatin over a 14 day period to SCID mice bearing SKOV-3 ovarian cancer xenografts. Immunostaining of tumor sections was employed to quantify tumor proliferation, angiogenesis, and apoptosis using Ki-67, CD-31, caspase-3 (CASP3), and terminal deoxytransferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL). Continuous ip administration of carboplatin resulted in greater tumor growth inhibition than intermittent therapy (p < 0.05). Significantly greater tumor cell apoptosis and less cell proliferation and angiogenesis were measured in tumors of mice treated with continuous carboplatin as compared to both intermittent and control groups. These results indicate that continuous local administration may be a promising approach to improve the effectiveness of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".