Ototoxicity following pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A prospective cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our objectives were to describe the frequency and determine risk factors for hearing deterioration following pediatric stem cell transplantation (SCT). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we performed pure tone audiometry and measured otoacoustic emissions (OAE) prior to and following SCT. Worse hearing was considered deterioration in either audiometry or OAE. RESULTS: Between October 2000 and November 2002, 45 informative audiometry or OAE results were obtained. Hearing deteriorated following SCT in 20/45 (44%) of these children. Those with worse hearing following SCT were more likely to have neuroblastoma (odds ratio [OR] 16.0 [95% CI 1.8, 143.2; P = 0.003]), receive carboplatin conditioning (OR 7.7 [95% CI 1.4, 41.9; P = 0.01]), have abnormal baseline hearing (OR 5.1 [95% CI 1.3, 19.5; P = 0.02]), and have higher baseline serum creatinine (OR for every increase of 5 micromol/L of serum creatinine of 1.5 [95% CI 1.03, 2.1; P = 0.03]). CONCLUSION: Many children who undergo SCT will have deterioration in hearing following SCT. A high-risk group of children can be delineated who may benefit from more intensive audiological monitoring following SCT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".