MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145273609 · doi:10.12927/whp.2006.17892

Modes of Delivery and Delivery Assistance in Rural Bangladesh

2006· article· en· W2145273609 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ataharul Islam, Rafiqul Chowdhury

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld health & population · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyAnemiaPublic healthRural areaObstetricsDeveloping countryEnvironmental healthRural healthFamily medicinePediatricsNursingEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: This paper employs statistical methods to identify the factors associated with modes of delivery and delivery assistance in rural areas of Bangladesh. The principal objective of this paper is to suggest various policy options on the basis of study findings in order to provide guidelines to improve the overall delivery-related morbidity conditions in Bangladesh. METHODS: This study analyzes data from a followup study conducted by the Bangladesh Institute of Research for Health and Technologies (BIRPERHT) on maternal morbidity in rural Bangladesh in 1993. A total of 1020 pregnant women were interviewed in the followup component of the study. For the purpose of this study, we selected 993 pregnant women with at least one antenatal followup. RESULTS: It is observed that the mode of delivery is complicated (assisted or destructive) if the pregnancy is either first or fifth or higher order and if bleeding occurred during the antenatal period. More educated respondents, high-risk pregnancies, pregnancies with past history of anemia and respondents who reported marriage at a relatively higher age receive assistance from trained personnel at a significantly higher proportion. Some of the important findings are: (1) first pregnancy or fifth or higher prior pregnancies and hemorrhage during pregnancy increase the risk of assisted or destructive modes of delivery; and (2) first or fifth or higher prior pregnancies are more likely to seek assistance from trained health personnel; similarly, regular antenatal visits and past history of anemia are also positively associated with seeking assistance from trained personnel. However, still there is a substantial proportion of women who remain at risk of complicated deliveries assisted by untrained personnel, posing a formidable challenge to policymakers. CONCLUSION: The results indicate several policy options: (1) the high-risk group, first or fifth or higher pregnancies, need special care and the existing health management system may be strengthened to create awareness among potential mothers for seeking appropriate measures from the beginning of pregnancy; (2) antenatal followup can be emphasized for high-risk pregnancies, and for respondents with a past history of anemia and other complications, a realistic referral system can be developed; (3) the campaign for increased age at marriage and increased age at first birth needs to focus the health issues more extensively; and (4) education for women needs to be given very high priority in order to bring about a lasting impact on the overall health condition of women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld health & populationSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207