Determination of high-risk impact sites on a Hybrid III headform by finite element analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current standards and methods to evaluate helmet performance remain focused on traumatic brain injuries and not concussive injuries. This is reflected in the methodologies currently used and the injury metrics employed to determine the pass/fail criteria for the helmets being tested. To address the problem surrounding concussion and helmets, a method reflecting high risk of concussive injury must be developed. The purpose of this research was to identify high risk of concussive injury impact sites on the Hybrid III headform using the Wayne State head injury finite element model. The Hybrid III headform was impacted using a linear impactor in five different sites with four angles per site at 5.5 m/s. The resulting acceleration loading curves were used as input for brain deformation analyses using the Wayne State University Brain Injury Model. The brain deformation results indicated that there are 12 impact conditions on the Hybrid III headform which reflect a risk of concussion above 80% when compared with the literature. The method used and impact sites discovered by this research differ significantly from the current standard method and may be used to guide future impact sites for the evaluation of helmet performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".