The RNA helicase RHAU (DHX36) unwinds a G4-quadruplex in human telomerase RNA and promotes the formation of the P1 helix template boundary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human telomerase RNA (hTR) contains several guanine tracts at its 5'-end that can form a G4-quadruplex structure. Previous evidence suggests that a G4-quadruplex within this region disrupts the formation of an important structure within hTR known as the P1 helix, a critical element in defining the template boundary for reverse transcription. RNA associated with AU-rich element (RHAU) is an RNA helicase that has specificity for DNA and RNA G4-quadruplexes. Two recent studies identify a specific interaction between hTR and RHAU. Herein, we confirm this interaction and identify the minimally interacting RNA fragments. We demonstrate the existence of multiple quadruplex structures within the 5' region of hTR and find that these regions parallel the minimal sequences capable of RHAU interaction. We confirm the importance of the RHAU-specific motif in the interaction with hTR and demonstrate that the helicase activity of RHAU is sufficient to unwind the quadruplex and promote an interaction with 25 internal nucleotides to form a stable P1 helix. Furthermore, we have found that a 5'-terminal quadruplex persists following P1 helix formation that retains affinity for RHAU. Finally, we have investigated the functional implications of this interaction and demonstrated a reduction in average telomere length following RHAU knockdown by small interfering RNA (siRNA).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".