Competitive adsorption of Ag (I) and Cu (II) by tripolyphosphate crosslinked chitosan beads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Alkalization of chitosan before crosslinking was applied in this study to enhance the adsorption capacity of the modified chitosan. Competitive adsorption of Ag (I) and Cu (II) from bimetallic solutions was studied using the newly synthesized tripolyphosphate crosslinked alkalized chitosan beads. Results indicated that alkalization before crosslinking helps to protect amine group from crosslinking and hence increases the uptake capacity and selectively of the synthesized beads toward Ag (I). The maximum uptakes of Ag (I) and Cu (II) were 82.9 and 15.5 mg g−1, respectively, at room temperature with an initial concentration of each metal being 2.0 mM and the sorbent dosage of 1.0 g L−1. The uptake of Ag (I) and Cu (II) by the beads can be better described by Langmuir isotherm and pseudo‐second rate equation. Analyses from FTIR and XPS confirmed that free amine, hydroxyl, and groups are involved in metal binding with amine and hydroxyl groups more selective to Ag (I). © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42717.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".