A Comparison of the Short-Term Effects of Oral Conjugated Equine Estrogens Versus Transdermal Estradiol on C-Reactive Protein, Other Serum Markers of Inflammation, and Other Hepatic Proteins in Naturally Menopausal Women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the effects of oral vs. transdermal estrogen therapy on C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, E- and P-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, serum amyloid A, transferrin, prealbumin, IGF-I, SHBG, thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG), and cortisol-binding globulin (CBG) in naturally menopausal women. DESIGN: This was a randomized, open-label crossover clinical trial. A 6-wk withdrawal from prior hormone therapy (baseline) was followed in randomized order by 12-wk oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEEs) (0.625 mg/d) and 12-wk transdermal estradiol (E2) (0.05 mg/d), with oral micronized progesterone (100 mg/d) given continuously during both regimens. RESULTS: A total of 27 women enrolled, and 25 completed both treatment periods. Nine parameters changed significantly during oral CEE (median percent change from baseline; P value): CRP (192%; P <0.001); E-selectin (-16.3%; P = 0.003); P-selectin (-15.3%; P = 0.012); ICAM-1 (-5%; P = 0.015); transferrin (5.3%; P = 0.024); IGF-I (-30.5%; P < 0.001); SHBG (113%; P < 0.001); TBG (38%; P < 0.001); and CBG (20%; P < 0.001). With transdermal E2, only three parameters changed significantly and to a lesser degree: ICAM-1 (-2.1%; P = 0.04); IGF-I (-12.5%; P < 0.001); and SHBG (2.6%; P = 0.042). During oral CEE the intrasubject changes in CRP correlated strongly with the changes in serum amyloid A (r = 0.805; P < 0.001), and were only weakly associated with the changes in SHBG (r = 0.248; nonsignificant), TBG (0.430; P = 0.031), and CBG (r = 0.072; nonsignificant). The log-log relationship between CRP and IL-6 observed at baseline showed a parallel shift during oral CEE, suggesting an amplified hepatic response or a greater sensitivity to IL-6 stimulation. CONCLUSION: Compared with oral CEE, transdermal E2 exerts minimal effects on CRP and the other inflammation and hepatic parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".