Parenteral nutrition related hepato-biliary disease in adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parenteral nutrition is a life-saving therapy in patients with intestinal failure. One of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients receiving long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is liver disease. Early on, there is steatosis, which can evolve to steatohepatitis and eventually to cholestasis of varying severity. The etiology of parenteral nutrition related liver disease is multifactorial. Provision of excess calories in the TPN solution, along with lipids administered >1 g/kg are thought to increase the risk of parenteral nutrition related liver disease. Other factors such as nutrient deficiencies and nutrient toxicities may also play a role in the pathogenesis of liver disease, along with sepsis and the lack of enteral stimulation. Non-pharmacological management strategies for TPN-related liver disease include enteral stimulation, optimal TPN composition, and avoidance of excess carbohydrate and lipid calories. Pharmacological therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid and antibiotic therapy to reduce the risk of bacterial translocation and sepsis should be considered. Early referral for transplantation should be considered in patients with evidence of portal hypertension. This review focuses on the clinical aspects, pathogenesis, and management strategies of parenteral nutrition-related liver disease in adult patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".