MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145546535 · doi:10.1517/17460441.2014.891580

The discovery and development of perampanel for the treatment of epilepsy

2014· review· en· W2145546535 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Takahisa Hanada

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Drug Discovery · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerampanelEpilepsyAMPA receptorMedicinePharmacologyNeurosciencePsychologyGlutamate receptorReceptorPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Perampanel is a novel AMPA receptor antagonist, approved in over 35 countries as an adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures in patients with epilepsy aged 12 years and older (18 years and older in Canada). These countries include the members of the European Union, the USA, Canada and Switzerland. The AMPA receptor antagonist, perampanel, is the first approved antiepileptic drug to inhibit excitation of postsynaptic membranes through the selective inhibition of glutamate receptors. AREAS COVERED: This drug discovery case history focuses on the discovery and profiling of perampanel. It analyzes the pharmacological, behavioral and molecular mechanisms of perampanel and how they contribute to the therapeutic benefits of the drug. The article is based on the data reported in published preclinical and clinical studies, product labels and poster presentations. EXPERT OPINION: Preclinical studies of perampanel have identified its broad-spectrum antiseizure effects in acute seizure models, with a narrow therapeutic index in the rotarod test similar to other AMPA receptor antagonists. This narrow therapeutic index is a potential problem for AMPA receptor antagonists. However, the discovery that perampanel has a very long half-life in humans, with gradual accumulation in plasma, could contribute to the development of tolerance. This, coupled with the identification of an optimal dosing strategy for individual patients, may help to maximize the utility of perampanel in the treatment of epilepsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.833

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Drug DiscoverySame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207