Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amphiphilic block copolymer (BCP) micelles are nanocarriers that hold promise for controlled delivery applications. This account highlights our recent works on light-dissociable BCP micelles. We have designed and developed light-responsive amphiphilic BCPs whose micellar aggregates (core-shell micelles and vesicles) can be disrupted by light exposure. The basic strategy is to incorporate a chromophore into the structure of the hydrophobic block, whose photoreaction can result in a conformational or structural change that shifts the hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance toward the destabilization of the micelles. Using various chromophores including azobenzene, pyrene and nitrobenzene, we have achieved both reversible and irreversible dissociation of BCP micelles upon illumination with UV/visible or near infrared light. The demonstrated rational design principle based on light-changeable or light-switchable amphiphilicity is general and can be applied to many polymer/chromophore combinations. This opens the door to developing photocontrollable polymer nanocarriers offering control over when and where the release of loaded agents takes place.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".