The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on dorsolateral prefrontal glutamate in youth with treatment-resistant depression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a debilitating psychiatric disorder characterized by feelings of low self-worth, loss of interest and suicidal thoughts. An estimated 350 million people are affected worldwide, 15% being adolescents. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive intervention that modulates cortical excitability by inducing electric currents in neurons by administering pulsating magnetic fields to the scalp. Studies have shown the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) to be implicated in positive effects on emotion, and glutamate/Glx levels to be decreased in MDD patients. In adults, rTMS has been shown to significantly improve mood, decrease Hamilton Depression Scores and increase glutamate, glutamine and choline levels in the DLPFC. We hypothesize an increase in DLPFC glutamate levels following treatment. Eleven treatment-resistant MDD patients (4 females and 7 males, ages 15-21) were recruited and clinically assessed using the Hamilton Depression/Anxiety Rating Scale and the Children’s Depression Rating Scale at baseline, and during each week of treatment for three weeks. Participants also underwent baseline and post-treatment MRI scans. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to measure glutamate levels and data was analysed using the LC model method. TMS treatments were performed daily for three weeks and treatment response was defined as ≥50% decrease in baseline Ham-D rating scale. In general, rTMS treatments were well tolerated, however some patients described minor side effects of mild headaches and scalp discomfort. Seven patients were treatment responders who showed symptom improvement, a 62% decrease in Ham-D scores from 25.43 (±7.85) to 9.57 (±1.51) and a 30% decrease in CDRS scores from 74.43 (±11.04) to 52.14 (±8.99). Ham-A scores decreased 78% from 23.86 (±9.65) to 5.29 (±3.55). In the left DLPFC, treatment responder glutamine levels increased by 5% and Glx levels increased by 10% in the DLPFC. Responders also showed lower baseline glutamate levels at 8.73 (±1.21) mmol/kg-wet-weight, which increased by 12% to 9.77 (±1.18) following treatment. Interestingly, non-responders had higher baseline glutamate levels at 11.87 (±0.47) and levels decreased by 9% to 10.75 (±0.13). These findings are consistent with previous literature. Evidence of increases in excitatory neurotransmitter levels in the DLPFC and alleviation of symptoms following treatment indicate that rTMS exerts anti-depressant effects and can be pursued as a safe and effective therapy for adolescent MDD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".