MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145571322 · doi:10.1155/s0161171204305193

On defining the product <i>r</i><sup>−<i>k</i></sup> · ∇<sup><i>l</i></sup><i>δ</i>

2004· article· en· W2145571322 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Analysis
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Mathematical Society
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsProduct (mathematics)Normalization (sociology)Differentiable functionPure mathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let ρ ( s ) be a fixed infinitely differentiable function defined on R + = [0, ∞ ) having the properties: (i) ρ ( s ) ≥ 0, (ii) ρ ( s ) = 0 for s ≥ 1, and (iii) where δ n ( x ) = c m n m ρ ( n 2 r 2 ) and c m is the constant satisfying (iii). We overcome difficulties arising from computing ∇ l δ n and express this regular sequence by two mutual recursions and use a Java swing program to evaluate corresponding coefficients. Hence, we are able to imply the distributional product r − k · ∇ l δ for k = 1, 2, … and l = 0, 1, 2, … with the help of Pizetti′s formula and the normalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it