MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The lowermost mantle beneath northern Asia-I. Multi-azimuth studies of a D″ heterogeneity

2002· article· en· W2145592785 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christine Thomas, J. M. Kendall, Michael Weber

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlownessGeologySeismometerSeismologyAzimuthGreat circleDiscontinuity (linguistics)GeodesyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In most areas of the globe it is only possible to sample the lowermost mantle or D″ region with a limited range of azimuths. This is due to limitations in source–receiver geometries. An exception is the region beneath northern Siberia where we are able to sample D″ along orthogonal great-circle paths using northern-Pacific earthquakes recorded in Europe and Hindu-Kush earthquakes recorded in Canada. Receiver vespagrams (slant stacks of one source recorded at many receivers) for a Kurile event recorded at the German Regional Seismic Network (GRSN) and the Gräfenberg-array and source vespagrams (many sources, one receiver) of Hindu-Kush events recorded at stations of the Canadian National Seismograph Network (CNSN) show reflections from a discontinuity at the top of D″. Vespagrams for real data are compared to vespagrams for synthetic data in order to guide their interpretation. Additional support for our interpretation comes from frequency-wavenumber (ƒ−k) analysis which provides a measure of the slowness and azimuth of a given phase. The traveltimes of the D″ reflected phases are then used to provide estimates of D″ thickness. In regions where the roughly orthogonal paths overlap we estimate the thickness to be 310 (±15) km, which is in agreement with existing models for this region. We also estimate a thickness of 210 (±15) km in a previously unsampled region east of this area. Using the slowness, backazimuth and traveltime values for a third source–receiver combination, we find a reflection point at a depth of 2800 km (thickness of D″ of 91 km) in a region several degrees to the west. These results and those of previous studies suggest considerable topographic relief (100 km) over distances of less than 5° (approximately 300 km at the CMB). Comparing the results from this study with results from other seismic studies of D″ structure in this area, we find this to be a complicated region which exhibits heterogeneity on many scales. This region may be the lower-mantle graveyard of the subducted Izanagi plate and one interpretation of this complexity is that it is due to subduction related deformation at the base of the mantle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207