Long-term effects of intrauterine growth restriction on cardiac metabolism and susceptibility to ischaemia/reperfusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Adult offspring who are born intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) are at risk of developing cardiovascular diseases during adulthood. Additionally, several cardiac diseases are associated with changes in myocardial energy metabolism. However, the potential long-term effects of being born IUGR on cardiac energetics are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effect of IUGR on cardiac performance and energy metabolism under aerobic conditions and after ischaemia/reperfusion (IR) injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: To induce IUGR, pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to hypoxic (11.5% O(2)) or control (21% O(2)) environments from day 15 to 21 of pregnancy. Cardiac susceptibility to IR was evaluated in male and female offspring at 4 (young-adult) or 12 (ageing) months of age using isolated working hearts. Cardiac production of energy was evaluated using radiolabelled substrates. Both male and female IUGR offspring exhibited an increased susceptibility to IR injury compared with controls (P< 0.05) as well as an increased post-ischaemic production of protons (P< 0.001) secondary to a mismatch between myocardial glycolysis and glucose oxidation rates. Moreover, offspring born IUGR exhibited an increased myocardial production of acetyl-CoA during reperfusion. The mismatch between energy production and cardiac performance indicates that in IUGR offspring, cardiac efficiency during reperfusion was decreased relative to controls. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that hypoxia-induced IUGR has long-term effects on cardiac susceptibility to IR injury that are independent of sex and age. Moreover, we identified a mismatch in glucose metabolism, leading to proton accumulation in the post-ischaemic myocardium of offspring born IUGR as a potential mechanism involved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".