CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF URANYL MOLYBDATES. X. THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF Ag10[(UO2)8O8(Mo5O20)]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crystals of a new silver uranyl molybdate, Ag10[(UO2)8O8(Mo5O20)], have been synthesized by high-temperature solid-state reaction. The structure [monoclinic, C2/c, a 24.672(2), b 23.401(2), c 6.7932(4) A, 94.985(2)°, V 3907.3(4) A 3 , Z = 4] was solved by direct methods and refined to R1 = 0.049 (wR2 = 0.101) on the basis of 4317 unique observed reflections using a crystal twinned on (001). The twinning causes overlap of the reflections with l = 3n. The structure is based upon complex double sheets of UrO5 pentagonal bipyramids and Mo polyhedra. The double sheets are parallel to (100) and consist of two [(UO2)2O2(MoO5)] sheets of UrO5 bipyramids and MoO6 octahedra. Within the [(UO2)2O2(MoO5)] sheets, UrO5 bipyramids share edges to produce complex chains parallel to the c axis and linked via pairs of edge-sharing MoO6 octahedra. The two [(UO2)2O2(MoO5)] sheets are linked into double [(UO2)8O8(Mo5O20)] sheets via the Mo(3)O4 tetrahedron located between the sheets. The MoO4 tetrahedra share two corners with two MoO6 octahedra of the sheet above and two corners with MoO6 octahedra from the sheet below, so that Mo5O20 pentanuclear clusters are formed. The uranyl molybdate sheets found in the structure have not been previously observed in uranyl minerals and inorganic compounds. The Ag(2), Ag(3), Ag(6), Ag(7), and Ag(8) atoms are located within the double sheets, whereas the Ag(1), Ag(4), and Ag(5) are in between the double sheets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".