MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145653012 · doi:10.1586/14760584.2.5.619

Heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: current and future impact

2003· review· en· W2145653012 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katherine Hsu, Stephen I. Pelton

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Vaccines · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStreptococcus pneumoniaeImmunogenicityPneumococcal diseasePneumococcal conjugate vaccineConjugate vaccineImmunologyPneumococcal infectionsPneumococcal vaccineLicensureDiseaseVaccinationImmunizationIntensive care medicinePediatricsAntibioticsMicrobiologyAntigenInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diseases caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae contribute significantly to worldwide morbidity and mortality. S. pneumoniae is now the number one cause of invasive bacterial disease in children in countries where Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) disease has been conquered by use of the Hib conjugate vaccine. Licensure of a heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease in children less than 5 years old in the USA represents the culmination of more than five decades of pneumococcal vaccine development. This review will: highlight safety, immunogenicity and efficacy studies that led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of this PCV7; summarize data about the incidence of childhood pneumococcal disease in the USA subsequent to licensure; review PCV7 treatment guidelines currently in place in the USA, Canada and Australia; and consider future directions in pneumococcal vaccine research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of VaccinesSame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207