MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145810686 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp295

Personalized medicine and antiplatelet therapy: ready for prime time?

2009· article· en· W2145810686 on OpenAlexaff
Céline Verstuyft, Tabassome Simon, Richard B. Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePharmacogeneticsPersonalized medicineIntensive care medicineAspirinDrugAntiplatelet drugPharmacologyPharmacotherapyPrecision medicinePharmacogenomicsCombination therapyP2Y12BioinformaticsInternal medicineClopidogrel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of personalized medicine is receiving significant attention due to the greater awareness of the influence of genes to the drug effects. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the DNA are the most frequent form of sequence variations in the human genome and appear to affect the efficacy and safety of many drugs. The term ‘pharmacogenetics’ was coined over 40 years ago with an ultimate goal of using the genetic makeup of an individual to predict drug response and efficacy.1–3 We are just at the beginning of a new era in personalized cardiovascular therapies. However there is little doubt that, in the near future, pharmacogenetic testing will become a valuable tool for a drug and dose selection and thus result in a more desirable benefit/risk ratio for drugs prescribed to patients. Over the past decades, the platelet has emerged as a major pathway involved in cardiovascular diseases. The platelet as a ‘drug target’ has spawned a variety of new drugs that have been shown in large-scale randomized trials to improve patient outcomes in acute coronary syndromes and following percutaneous revascularization procedures.4–6 Until recently aspirin, centred on the tromboxane pathway, was the only antiplatelet agent considered to be the gold standard for effectiveness in both primary and secondary prevention of atherothrombotic diseases.7 Although it continues to be used as the gold standard antiplatelet therapy, adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase inhibitors in combination therapy appear to exert synergistic effects and provide added benefits among high-risk patients for cardiovascular disease.7,8 Nevertheless an important lesson that has emerged from number of trials is that antiplatelet potency per se does not necessarily guarantee enhanced clinical benefit or tolerability for a given patient.8–11 This may in part be due to the … *Corresponding author. Tel: +1 519 663 3553, Fax: +1 519 663 3232, Email: richard.kim{at}lhsc.on.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.010
Scholarly communication0.0120.018
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0160.026
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207