Hubungan Kondisi Higiene dan Sanitasi dengan Keberadaan Escherechia Coli pada Nasi Kucing yang Dijual di Wilayah Tembalang Semarang Tahun 2012
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Makanan merupakan suatu hal yang sangat penting bagi kehidupan manusia. Keberadaan bakteri Escherichia coli dalam sumber air atau makanan merupakan indikasi pasti terjadinya kontaminasi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengetahui hubungan kondisi higiene dan sanitasi dengan jumlah kuman dan kandungan E. coli pada nasi bungkus. Jenis penelitian adalah explanatory research dengan metode observasi dan pendekatan Cross Sectional. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah total populasi yaitu semua pengolah nasi kucing berjumlah 14 pengolah. Uji statistik yang dipakai adalah Uji Chi-Square. Berdasarkan penelitian ini dapat diketahui sebagian besar pengolah makanan memiliki praktik pengolahan baik, sedangkan hasil analisis diketahui tidak ada hubungan antara praktik pengolahan makanan dengan keberadaan E.coli (p= 0,929). Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan sebagian besar pengolah makanan memiliki sanitasi pengolahan baik, sedangkan hasil analisis diketahui tidak ada hubungan antara sanitasi alat (p=,0,857), air pencucian (p= 0,929) dan tempat (p=0,5) dengan keberadaan E.coli. Kata Kunci: higiene dan sanitasi, Escherichia coli
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".